Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 20151126185209.GN4073@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> Not working with the cmake version shipped in current distributions would
> almost certainly cause us to reject this patch.  Adding a new build
> dependency is bad enough; adding one that isn't easily available is a
> show-stopper.  You'd better think in terms of what's provided with RHEL6,
> not RHEL7, as the minimum baseline on the Red Hat side.  I'm not sure what
> the oldest active LTS distribution is in the Debian world, but I'm pretty
> sure it won't have cmake 3.

Current Debian Stable (wheezy) has cmake 3.0.2.  Oldstable (jessie) has
2.8.4.

As for Ubuntu, according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS the oldest still
supported is 12.04 (Precise Pangolin) and they have 2.8.7:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/cmake

For these systems, the CMake 2.8 functionality would be enough.  No need
to go back to 2.6.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: YUriy Zhuravlev
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: New email address