Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented
Date
Msg-id 20151111212757.GL614468@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier wrote:

> I recall that we had some talks about grouping all the relopts into a
> single documentation section, perhaps not having one is at the origin
> of the confusion?

I think you're remembering this:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150402205713.GB22175@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-table log_autovacuum_min_duration is actually documented
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan