Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Thanks. For comparison, I wrote a patch to implement what I had in mind.
>
> When a WAL-skipping COPY begins, we add an entry for that relation in a
> "pending-fsyncs" hash table. Whenever we perform any action on a heap that
> would normally be WAL-logged, we check if the relation is in the hash table,
> and skip WAL-logging if so.
I think this wasn't applied, was it?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
