Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files
Date
Msg-id 20151014143527.GG30738@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files  (Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files  (Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@zoho.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-10-14 16:50:41 +0300, Amir Rohan wrote:
> > I don't think we as a community want to do that without review
> > mechanisms in place, and I personally don't think we want to add
> > separate processes for this.
> > 
> 
> That's what "contribute" means in my book.

Then your argument about the CF process doesn't seem to make sense.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amir Rohan
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files
Next
From: Amir Rohan
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: pg_confcheck - syntactic & semantic validation of postgresql configuration files