On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:14:40PM +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> On Monday 28 September 2015 08:23:46 David Fetter wrote:
> > They may well be, but until we decide it's worth the switching
> > costs to move to a totally different way of doing things, that
> > system will stay in place.
> Until we decide we're wasting time
Great!
Since you're convinced that this is an unqualified win, please put
together a project plan for switching from our current system to
Github. Make sure to account for all current functionality, even if
your plan is to drop it without archiving. For bonus points, you can
do a side-by-side comparison of the system we have with the system you
envision, including the running and switching costs. While
people-hours isn't a great metric, you could start with that, or
propose a different one.
> >Neither magic wands nor a green field project are in operation here.
> Now any stick will help. IMHO
That is an assertion that you now have an opportunity to back with
some kind of plan based on our current system and the future system
you envision.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
