Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Date
Msg-id 20150908210504.GT3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2015-08-27 18:37:10 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> > Yes, I concur. It now needs an acquireLocksOnSubLinks_context with
> > for_execute = true, but otherwise it should work.
>
> Ok, I'll push that then, unless somebody else wants to do the honors.

Done.  Apologies about it taking so long, the TAP test failure issue
with 'make check' had me tied up for a bit.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: why can the isolation tester handle only one waiting process?