Re: PATCH: numeric timestamp in log_line_prefix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 18:28 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I think the extra ugliness is warranted, since it's not THAT much
> > additional ugliness, and not doing it could be considered a regression;
> > apparently strftime can be slower even than snprintf, so doing it twice
> > per log message might be excessive overhead.
> 
> Patch attached. Please take a quick look.

Looks good.


-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services