Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> > But I'm not sure I like the idea of adding a server dependency on the
> > ability to exec pg_controldata. That seems like it could be
> > unreliable at best, and a security vulnerability at worst.
>
> I hadn't been paying attention --- the proposed patch actually depends on
> exec'ing pg_controldata? That's horrid! There is no expectation that
> that's installed.
No, it doesn't. For the pg_controldata output it processes the
pg_control file directly, and for pg_config it relies on compile-time
CPPFLAGS.
I think trying to duplicate the exact strings isn't too nice an
interface.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services