On 2015-09-02 14:30:33 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I was thinking in having this be renamed src/test/modules/extensions/
> and then the extension contained here would be renamed ext001_fk_tables
> or something like that; later we could ext002_something for testing some
> other angle of extensions, not necessarily pg_dump related.
The largest dataset we have for this is the current regression test
database, it seems a waste not to include it...
> That's another option, but we've had this idea for many years now and it
> hasn't materialized.
But that's just minimally more complex than what's currently done in
that test and in the pg_upgrade test?
> As I recall, Andrew Dunstan has a module that
> tests cross-version pg_upgrade and one thing he does is dump both and
> compare; the problem is that there are differences, so he keeps a count
> of how many lines he expect to differ between any two releases.
I'm not suggesting to do anything cross-release - that'd indeed be
another ballpark.
Just that instead of a pg_dump test that tests some individual things we
have one that tests the whole regression test output and then does a
diff?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
