Re: Shouldn't we document "don't use a mountpoint as $PGDATA"? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Shouldn't we document "don't use a mountpoint as $PGDATA"?
Date
Msg-id 20150902002527.GF27332@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shouldn't we document "don't use a mountpoint as $PGDATA"?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep  1, 2015 at 08:20:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:19:00PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > 
> > On 07/28/2015 02:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >I had a discussion with some folks at Red Hat about this:
> > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247477
> > >
> > >I had the idea that we had documented somewhere that the data directory
> > >should not be a filesystem mount point, but I sure can't find it now.
> > >Any objections to adding some text about this to section 17.2, near the
> > >caveats about NFS?
> > 
> >             
> > 
> > Please do. I came across a client who should have known better doing
> > this just a week or two ago.
> 
> Uh, we added an initdb warning about mount points:
> 
>     commit 17f15239325a88581bb4f9cf91d38005f1f52d69
>     Author: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
>     Date:   Sat Feb 16 18:52:50 2013 -0500
>     
>         Warn about initdb using mount-points
>     
>         Add code to detect and warn about trying to initdb or create pg_xlog on
>         mount points.
> 
> Was that not sufficient?

Oh, I see in the commit message you knew about the initdb warning ---
never mind.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Shouldn't we document "don't use a mountpoint as $PGDATA"?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Core dump with nested CREATE TEMP TABLE