On 2015-08-30 15:28:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> No no no, I'm proposing to remove the above-quoted lines and the configure
> test. sig_atomic_t is required by C89; there is no reason anymore to
> cope with it not being provided by <signal.h>.
Ok, that works for me. You seemed to be a bit more doubtful about the
sig_atomic_t support, that's why I thought you might want to do
something but rip it out. Seems like a pretty low risk thing to try.
Andres
