Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id 20150828052428.GB2529169@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:31:44AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > As Noah I think it'd be good if we, over time, started to document a few
> > more things one currently have to pick up over time. I'm wondering
> > whether these should be subsections under a new sect1 ('Code Structure'?
> > Don't like that much), or all independent sect1s.
> 
> "Structure" is certainly not what this material is.  Maybe "Miscellaneous
> Coding Conventions" is the best we can do for a title.  The items seem too
> short to be their own <sect1>'s.

"C Language Features" comes to mind.  I assume we're talking about names for a
<sect1> inside <chapter id="source">.

> > That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?
> 
> Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.

+1



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Øyvind A. Holm
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: version_stamp.pl: Add Git commit info to version if 'git' is specified
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: version_stamp.pl: Add Git commit info to version if 'git' is specified