Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id 20150817163643.GC10786@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-08-17 12:30:56 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> - The possibility that may repeatedly break #define FRONTEND
> compilation when we add static inline functions, where instead adding
> macros would not have caused breakage, thus resulting in continual
> tinkering with the header files.

Again, that's really independent. Inlines have that problem, even with
STATIC_IF_INLINE. C.f. MemoryContextSwitch() and a9baeb361d.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6