On 2015-08-04 15:20:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> OK, so do we want to rip out all instances of the static inline dance
> in favor of more straightforward coding? Do we then shut pandemelon
> and any other affected buildfarm members down as unsupported, or what?
I think all that happens is that they'll log a couple more warnings
about defined but unused static functions. configure already defines
inline away if not supported.
