Re: Autovacuum behavior - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Autovacuum behavior
Date
Msg-id 20150730185939.GT2441@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Autovacuum behavior  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum behavior  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
John Scalia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The autovacuum settings for a 9.4.2 database are shown below, I'm not
> absolutely certain if I missed anything:
>
> autovacuum = on
> log_autovacuum_min_duration = 100
> autovacuum_max_workers = 15
> autovacuum_naptime = 10min
> #autovacuum_vacuum_threshold = 50
> autovacuum_analyze_threshold = 80
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.1
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.2
> autovacuum_freeze_max_age = 100000000
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = -1

What's the vacuum_cost_limit setting?  Maybe they are sleeping for too
long, and don't have time to get to some of the other tables because all
15 workers are busy.  This gets worse the more workers there are.

I don't think the 10min naptime is doing you any favors, is it?

If you want them to go faster, maybe you need to lower the cost_delay.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: Autovacuum behavior
Next
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum behavior