On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:32:16PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:22:47PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > More: if the compiler does have a bug like that, how much confidence can
> > we have, really, that there are no other miscompiled places and won't be
> > any in the future? If we are going to support this configuration, I think
> > what the patch ought to do is disable PG_USE_INLINE globally when this
> > compiler is detected. That would revert the behavior to what it was
> > before 43d89a2.
>
> That's a reasonable alternative.
Here's the patch implementing it.
