Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > With some additional effort, we could get rid of perm_fmgr_info, at
> > least in pltcl. (That hack was introduced in a3ed622b63b and
> > 7748e9e7e5a back in 2001 and we never actually fixed it ...)
>
> Yes it seems so, even for plperl and plpython there seem to be some
> room for improvement at quick glance... This looks like a master-only
> change to me though (and I am sure we are on the same page). For
> back-branches something like the previous patch is definitely safer.
Yes, agreed on both counts. I will push the patch when I have a moment.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
