On 2015-07-02 23:56:16 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 01:46 PM, chenhj wrote:
> >Result(execute time):
> >default(8K), 7.370s
> >set SO_SNDBUF to 32K, 4.159s(the current implement)
> >set SO_SNDBUF to 64K, 2.875s
> >set SO_SNDBUF to 128K, 1.593s
> >set SO_SNDBUF to 256K, 1.324s
>
> I was about to commit the attached, but when I tested this between my
> Windows 8.1 virtual machine and Linux host, I was not able to see any
> performance difference. It may be because the case is hobbled by other
> inefficiencies, in the virtualization or somewhere else, but I wonder if
> others can reproduce the speedup?
Given that too small sockets incur significantly smaller latency bumps
in a virtualized environment than in a real network, and hit another set
of buffers inside the virtualization technology,, I'm not particularly
surprised by that.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
