On 2015-06-07 13:44:08 -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> I'd like to advocate for back-patching this to 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2. It has
> run without problems for a while now, and it can be considered a bug that
> systems with a very large number of objects cannot be upgraded in a
> reasonable time.
In that case, how about working on a version for <= 9.2 (single one
should suffice)? This will likely include a bunch of wrapper functions
to avoid changing the API in the back branches.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
