Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > However, I'm not real sure we need a flag. I think the use-case of
> > wanting extra logging for a bgworker under development is unlikely to be
> > satisfied very well by just causing existing start/stop logging messages
> > to come out at higher priority. You're likely to be wanting to log other,
> > bgworker-specific, events, and so you'll probably end up writing a bunch
> > of your own elog calls anyway (which you'll eventually remove, #ifdef out,
> > or decrease the log levels of).
>
> Yeah. So let's just change it.
+1
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
