Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Yeah, the case is pretty weird and I'm not really sure that the server
> > ought to be expected to behave. But if this is actually the only part
> > of the server that misbehaves because of sudden gigantic time jumps, I
> > think it's fair to patch it. Here's a proposed patch.
>
> I think the parenthetical bit in the comment should read "plus any
> fractional second, for simplicity". Also, maybe replace "300" by
> a #define constant MAX_AUTOVAC_SLEEPTIME for readability?
Okay, done.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
