Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time
Date
Msg-id 20150619152025.GH29350@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-06-19 11:16:18 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > I wonder whether it's such a good idea for the postmaster to give
> > up waiting before all children are gone (postmaster.c:1722 in HEAD).
> 
> I doubt it.

Seconded. It's pretty bad to possibly not be able to start again after
stopping it. I don't see the benefit in not waiting - sure, the
poastmaster exits faster, but postgres hasn't shut down at that point...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog --create-slot-if-not-exists
Next
From: Cédric Villemain
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivexlog --create-slot-if-not-exists