Re: 9.5 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 9.5 release notes
Date
Msg-id 20150616191700.GT133018@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:21:35AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > For pretty much the same reason, I'm not in favor of small caps either.
> > Even assuming we can do that consistently (which I bet we can't; we
> > do not have all that much control over how web browsers render HTML),
> > it would be calling attention to itself, which is exactly not the result
> > I think we should be after.
> 
> I am sure almost every browser can render smallcaps, even if it doesn't
> have a smallcaps-specific font installed --- same for PDF.

For HTML, smallcaps is a CSS property.  The way it works is that you
write in lowercase, and then the browser displays smallcaps.  So for the
browsers that don't do it correctly, it would just work fine by
displaying as lower case.

One trouble is how to write the SGML so that the smallcaps bits reach
the generated HTML.

I don't know about PDF.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1