Re: backup.sgml WIP (patch included) - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: backup.sgml WIP (patch included)
Date
Msg-id 20150602200451.GI2988@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup.sgml WIP (patch included)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: backup.sgml WIP (patch included)
List pgsql-docs
Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> A change I did not make per Craig Ringer (and plenty of other people through
> the years):
>
> "Instead we should be advising people to use pg_dump -Fc and pg_restore as
> their default and primary method of dumping a database. It is rarely
> desirable to use text dumps and if pg_dump was being written now, it'd
> surely default to -Fc ."
>
> I think we really need to think about this.

Yeah, this makes sense, except that if you want parallel dump (and many
people do) you need -Fd.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: backup.sgml WIP (patch included)
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: backup.sgml WIP (patch included)