Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)
Date
Msg-id 20150602113943.GA26887@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)  (Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti <fabio@vuole.me>)
Responses Re: Minor revision downgrade (9.2.11 -> 9.2.10)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jun  2, 2015 at 04:40:15PM +1200, Fabio Ugo Venchiarutti wrote:
> We're fairly confident that it's an issue with the hardware but we
> have political reasons to downgrade PG to 9.2.10 to show the hosting
> supplier that it's their fault.
>
>
> The release notes for 9.2.11 mention no data structure changes (in
> line with the usual PG versioning policy). Is it just as safe to
> downgrade too? We tested it on a couple non-critical boxes to no ill
> effect whatsoever, but we'd like a second opinion before we do it on
> the live installation too.

I have rarely seen this question asked.  I think minor-release
downgrading is fine in this case.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: odbc to emulate mysql for end programs
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: odbc to emulate mysql for end programs