On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 01:10:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Here is a re-run of pgindent on 9.4:
> > http://momjian.us/expire/pgindent-9.4.diff
>
> Some of those diffs would disappear if you'd used an up-to-date typedefs
> list ... not a lot, but some.
Uh, you mean a current 9.4.X typedef list? Should I try that?
> That is rather a lot of diffs, but the thing I think people ought to take
> away from that is "this is the number of back-patch hazards we just
> introduced between HEAD and 9.4" --- because as of yesterday, HEAD looks
> like this not like what's in 9.4. What's more, those hazards are in code
> hunks that were back-patched bug fixes, which means that they are in areas
> that are more likely than average to need additional fixing.
Yes, that is very true.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
