On 2015-05-20 16:44:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hm. Anole hasn't reported reliably for a while before these. It's quite
> > possible that this is a ac++ portability problem around the
> > atomics. There's lots of other IA64 animals not having problems, but
> > they're not using ac++.
>
> Lots? As far as I can tell, this is the only Itanium machine in the
> buildfarm.
Uh. I'm pretty sure there were some back when that patch went in. And
there definitely used to be a couple earlier. I guess itanium really is
dying (mixed bad: It's a horrible architecture, but more coverage would
still be good).
