Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions
Date
Msg-id 20150511190150.GC30322@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Now for a blast from the past...  This came up again on IRC recently and
> > reminded me that I ran into the same issue a couple years back.  Updated
> > patch includes the refactoring suggested and includes documentation.
> >
> > Barring objections, I'll push this later today.
>
> Small suggestion: a test case in src/test/isolation?

This is entirely a permissions-related change and src/test/isolation is
for testing concurrent behavior, not about testing permissions.

I'm not saying that we shouldn't have more tests there, but it'd not
be appropriate for this particular patch.
Thanks!
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: LOCK TABLE Permissions
Next
From: Abhijit Menon-Sen
Date:
Subject: Re: a fast bloat measurement tool (was Re: Measuring relation free space)