On 2015-04-25 20:47:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Since default_with_oids is really only meant as a backwards-compatibility
> hack, I don't personally have a problem with restricting it to act only on
> plain tables.
FWIW, I think we're getting pretty close to the point, or are there
even, where we can remove default_with_oids. So not adding complications
because of it sounds good to me.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
