Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11) - Mailing list pgsql-pkg-yum

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11)
Date
Msg-id 20150424083717.GA11149@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11)
List pgsql-pkg-yum
Re: Isaias Sanchez 2015-04-24 <dimitri/prefix/issues/11@github.com>
> If I can have several postgresql versions running is same machine (testing purpose), why can't I have also prefix
installedin every version of postgresql?  
>
> I would like to install both: prefix92 and prefix94 in the same server.

Hi,

the RPM packages are built by the yum.postgresql.org people (in Cc).
The prefix.spec file in the prefix repo hasn't been updated since
2008.

> # yum install prefix92.x86_64 prefix94.x86_64
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security
> Setting up Install Process
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
>  * base: ftp.udl.es
>  * epel: fedora.aau.at
>  * extras: ftp.udl.es
>  * rpmforge: mirror1.hs-esslingen.de
>  * updates: ftp.dei.uc.pt
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package prefix92.x86_64 0:1.2.0-1.rhel6 will be installed
> ---> Package prefix94.x86_64 0:1.2.3-1.rhel6 will be installed
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
>
=================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
>  Package                                                       Arch
    Version                                                             Repository
            Size 
>
=================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
> Installing:
>  prefix92                                                      x86_64
    1.2.0-1.rhel6                                                       pgdg92
            20 k 
>  prefix94                                                      x86_64
    1.2.3-1.rhel6                                                       pgdg94
            20 k 
>
> Transaction Summary
>
=================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================================
> Install       2 Package(s)
>
> Total download size: 41 k
> Installed size: 113 k
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> (1/2): prefix92-1.2.0-1.rhel6.x86_64.rpm
                                                                                                                   |
20kB     00:00      
> (2/2): prefix94-1.2.3-1.rhel6.x86_64.rpm
                                                                                                                   |
20kB     00:00      
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Total
                                                                                                           28 kB/s |
41kB     00:01      
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
>
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>   file /usr/share/doc/pgsql/extension/README.md conflicts between attempted installs of prefix92-1.2.0-1.rhel6.x86_64
andprefix94-1.2.3-1.rhel6.x86_6 
>
>
> ---
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/dimitri/prefix/issues/11

Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


pgsql-pkg-yum by date:

Previous
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: I can haz 9.0.19 RPM for RHEL 7?
Next
From: Devrim Gündüz
Date:
Subject: Re: [prefix] prefix92 conflict with another version of prefix (#11)