On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:34:45AM -0400, Adam Brightwell wrote:
> >
> > Good point. Next patch attached.
>
>
> /*
> - * Note: we'll reject zero or negative year values. Perhaps negatives
> - * should be allowed to represent BC years?
> + * Note: Non-positive years are taken to be BCE.
> */
>
> Previously, zero was rejected, what does it do now? I'm sure it represents
> 0 AD/CE, however, is that important enough to note given that it was not
> allowed previously?
Now, it's supposed to take 0 as 1 BCE, -1 as 2 BCE, etc. There should
probably be tests for that. The issue here is that zero was
popularized a very long time after the beginning of the Common Era.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
