On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 03:49:37PM +0200, Feike Steenbergen wrote:
> On 6 October 2014 14:09, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's a good catch and it should be a separate patch. This could even be
> > considered for a back-patch down to 9.2. Thoughts?
>
> If I isolate "DROP INDEX concurrently", this patch would do the trick.
Patch applied for 9.5. Thanks.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +