Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Date
Msg-id 20150317173209.GD10492@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:28:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Or in short: yes, the rules are different for committers and non
> committers.  That's one of the reasons we are slow to hand out commit
> bits.

I think one reason the rules are different for committers and
non-committers is that committers are responsible for quickly fixing
whatever breakage their patch application caused.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange assertion using VACOPT_FREEZE in vacuum.c
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in point releases 9.3.6 and 9.2.10?