Stephen Frost wrote:
> Having a curated list of active PUGs (where "active" is at least one
> meeting every other month, in my view..) and links to information about
> them would be good, but mailing lists are not that.
Actually we do have a list, curated (mostly) by Jon Katz. What is wrong
with that? Is that not backing enough from the postgresql.org website
to PUGs?
http://www.postgresql.org/community/user-groups/
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services