Re: To pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org 2015-02-17 <20150217153446.2590.24945@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
> 1164 1.fd
> 1164 9.fd
>
> 1488 1.fc
> 1160 9.fc
Re: Francisco Olarte 2015-02-17 <CA+bJJbza-+UOuofSVCoHdn6kMa3u4zWzgKZhyU=Qab46R4vY-w@mail.gmail.com>
> > pg_dump -Fd doesn't seem to care about -Z for Z > 0:
> >
>
> With such a small dump, are you sure du's block granularity is not masking
> the differences in -Fd ? ( Have you tried du -b, or just comparing every
> size ?) ( In -Fc it is a single file, harder to mask ).
I noticed when trying to compress an assumed-to-be-Z4 file a bit more
using -Z7. The directory was 241GB in both cases.
And if you compare with -Fc, the difference is a lot more than a few
FS blocks.
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
