On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:56:48AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/30/14 11:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The "API break" isn't a big issue imo. The net effect would be that eg
> > hstore 9.3.6 wouldn't work against a 9.3.5 server. We do that sort of
> > thing *all the time* --- at least twice in the past year, according to
> > a quick scan of the commit logs. If you were changing or removing a
> > function that third-party code might depend on, it'd be problematic,
> > but an addition has no such risk.
>
> This sort of things is actually a bit of an annoyance, because it means
> that for minor-version upgrades, you need to stop the server before
> unpacking the new version, otherwise the old running server will try to
> load the new hstore module and fail with a symbol lookup. This can
> increase the downtime significantly.
>
> Yes, we've done this before, and people have gotten bitten by it before.
Uh, do we ever support installing new binaries while the server is
running? I would hope not.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
