Re: Parallel Seq Scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date
Msg-id 20150109213422.GJ3062@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel Seq Scan  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Responses Re: Parallel Seq Scan
List pgsql-hackers
* Stefan Kaltenbrunner (stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc) wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 08:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Now, for debugging purposes, I could see such a parameter being
> > available but it should default to 'off/never-fail'.
>
> not sure what it really would be useful for - if I execute a query I
> would truely expect it to get answered - if it can be made faster if
> done in parallel thats nice but why would I want it to fail?

I was thinking for debugging only, though I'm not really sure why you'd
need it if you get a NOTICE when you don't end up with all the workers
you expect.
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS