Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE
Date
Msg-id 20146.1555361266@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Attached updated patch.

LGTM, pushed.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: finding changed blocks using WAL scanning
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding Unix domain socket path and port topg_stat_get_wal_senders()