On 2014-12-12 10:20:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On 12/12/14 8:13 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Wouldn't a make install-server/client targets or something similar
> >> actually achieve the same thing? Seems simpler to maintain to me.
>
> > Adding non-standard makefile targets comes with its own set of
> > maintenance issues.
>
> It would be of zero value to packagers anyway; certainly so for those
> following the Red Hat tradition, in which you tell the package Makefile
> to install everything and then what goes into which subpackage is
> sorted out in a separate, subsequent step. Possibly Debian or other
> packaging infrastructures do it differently, but I doubt that.
Debian has that step as well - you don't really have to use it, but the
postgres debian packages do so. They already don't adhere to the current
distinction.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
