Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)
Date
Msg-id 20141211195203.GN1768@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> That's one thought. Robert said the same thing about when he was the
> commitfest manager; he just reviewed most the patches himself in the end.
> And you mentioned that Tom used to review 70% of all incoming patches. How
> about we make that official? It's the commitfest manager's duty to review
> all the patches. He can recruit others if he can, but at the end of the day
> he's expected to take a look at every patch, and commit or return with some
> feedback.
> 
> The problem with that is that we'll have a hard time to find volunteers for
> that. But we only need to find one sucker for each commitfest. I can
> volunteer to do that once a year; if the other active committers do the
> same, we're covered.

Hm, I was commitfest manager once, too, and this exact same thing
happened.  Maybe we need to make that official, and give the sucker some
perk.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)