* Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
> On 11/18/2014 04:58 PM, Adam Brightwell wrote:
> >Attached is a quite trivial patch that addresses the int64 (C) to
> >int8 (SQL) mapping issue.
>
> I think we should just apply this now. As Tom said the reason for
> not doing it is long gone.
Alright, done.
Thanks!
Stephen