Re: Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code
Date
Msg-id 20141104134156.GP28295@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code  (Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>)
Responses Re[2]: [HACKERS] Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code  (Alexey Vasiliev <leopard_ne@inbox.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2014-11-03 14:04:00 +0300, Alexey Vasiliev wrote:
> *  What the patch does in a short paragraph: This patch should add option recovery_timeout, which help to control
timeoutof restore_command nonzero status code. Right now default value is 5 seconds. This is useful, if I using for
restoreof wal logs some external storage (like AWS S3) and no matter what the slave database will lag behind the
master.The problem, what for each request to AWS S3 need to pay, what is why for N nodes, which try to get next wal log
each5 seconds will be bigger price, than for example each 30 seconds. Before I do this in this way: " if !
(/usr/local/bin/envdir/etc/wal-e.d/env /usr/local/bin/wal-e wal-fetch "%f" "%p"); then sleep 60; fi ". But in this case
restart/stopdatabase slower.
 

Without saying that the feature is unneccessary, wouldn't this better be
solved by using streaming rep most of the time?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?
Next
From: "ktm@rice.edu"
Date:
Subject: Re: Let's drop two obsolete features which are bear-traps for novices