> The performance of our numeric vs Oracle's was a common complaint when
> I was at EnterpriseDB (in 2007).
>
> Perhaps numeric's performance could be greatly improved in cases where
> the precision is low enough to map to an int/bigint. That would get us
> closer to eliminating money as well as give other uses a big win. Of
> course, how to do that and not break pg_upgrade is a huge question...
Just out of curiosity, why is Oracle's NUMBER (I assume you are
talking about this) so fast?
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
