Re: Deal with <>s in message IDs - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Deal with <>s in message IDs
Date
Msg-id 20141030121259.GK1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Deal with <>s in message IDs  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Deal with <>s in message IDs  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-www
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Vik Fearing <vik@xocolatl.community> wrote:
> > On 10/30/2014 12:46 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote:
> >>> If you're referring to the <> issue, my problem is this: If you paste
> >>> '<message-ID>' into commitfest instead of just 'message-ID' you get no
> >>> results, because it creates a URL that contains the <>s. Obviously
> >>> commitfest could be taught to strip <>, but ISTM it's more useful to have
> >>> pgarchives do it.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I still don't understand what you mean. And I'd still need an
> >> example link that shows the wrong thing, both to understand it and to
> >> verify a fix..
> >
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/%3CCABUevEyy05BHq21BA0CgYcsmvd06ZKXpXPAwr1khZ+RGk+4PUA@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > versus
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEyy05BHq21BA0CgYcsmvd06ZKXpXPAwr1khZ+RGk+4PUA@mail.gmail.com
> 
> Ok, I'm sorry, but I'm still confused here. Where do we actually
> generate the first link, the one that's wrong? Do we put the wrong
> thing in our thread browsing somewhere? If so, I'm still failing to
> find it :)

Some people enter message-ids with the < > delimiters in the commitfest app.

I'm not really sure this really belongs in the archives app.  We could
just have the commitfest app remove them on input.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Deal with <>s in message IDs
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Deal with <>s in message IDs