Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
Date
Msg-id 20141027144729.GR28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage
List pgsql-hackers
All,

* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e@gmx.net) wrote:
> It would be weird if it were inconsistent: some things require role
> membership, some things require SET ROLE.  Try explaining that.

Attached is a patch to address the pg_cancel/terminate_backend and the
statistics info as discussed previously.  It sounds like we're coming to
consensus that this is the correct approach.  Comments are always
welcome, of course, but it's a pretty minor patch and I'd like to move
forward with it soon against master.

We'll rebase the role attributes patch with these changes and update
that patch for review (with a few other changes) after.
Thanks!
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb generator functions
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of GetUserId() Usage