Re: KEY UPDATE / UPDATE / NO KEY UPDATE distinction vs. README.tuplock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: KEY UPDATE / UPDATE / NO KEY UPDATE distinction vs. README.tuplock
Date
Msg-id 20141023235529.GJ1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to KEY UPDATE / UPDATE / NO KEY UPDATE distinction vs. README.tuplock  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Florian Pflug wrote:

> It seems that README.tuplock never got updated when the KEY SHARE patch's
> lock level were changed from being KEY UPDATE / UPDATE / SHARE / KEY SHARE
> to UPDATE / NO KEY UPDATE / SHARE / KEY SHARE.

You're right.  We changed the tuple lock modes at the last minute and
I forgot to update this README.  I just pushed it; thanks for the patch
and for improving the wording of that paragraph also.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option