Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
Date
Msg-id 20141003221628.GM14522@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct  4, 2014 at 12:13:00AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Do we really want to expose a setting a few of us _might_ ask customers
> > to change?
> 
> They also will try that themselves. Our customers aren't a horde of dumb
> people. Some of them are willing to try things if they hit scalability
> problesm. And *lots* of people hit scalability problems with
> postgres. In fact I've seen big users migrate away from postgres because
> of them.
> 
> And it's not like this only affects absurd cases. Even a parallel
> restore will benefit.

I disagree.  I just don't see the value in having such undefined
variables.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixed xloginsert_locks for 9.4