* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Done --- 201409291 is the cutover point.
>
> > Just to clarify- the commit bumped the catversion to 201409292, so
> > version <= 201409291 has the old format while version > 201409291 has
> > the new format. There was no 201409291, so I suppose it doesn't matter
> > too much, but technically 'version >= 201409291' wouldn't be accurate.
>
> Nope. See my response to Andrew: ...1 is the cutover commit Bruce
> should use, because that's what it is in 9.4.
Yup, makes sense.
Thanks!
Stephen
