On 2014-09-11 16:58:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 02:24:17AM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
> >> I think the reason nobody's responding is because nobody has anything
> >> significant to add. It's a behavior change from not-working to
> >> working. Why wouldn't it be backpatched?
>
> > OK, Greg seems to be passionate about this. Does anyone _object_ to my
> > back-patching the epoch preservation fix through 9.3. Tom?
>
> Not I. This is a data-loss bug fix, no? Why would we not back-patch it?
Also, what possible reason could there be for preservation to be
problematic? Epoch overflow maybe :P
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
