* Vik Fearing (vik.fearing@dalibo.com) wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 10:17 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> > Yeah, I think I like this better than allowing all of them without the
> > database name.
>
> Why? It's just a noise word!
Eh, because it ends up reindexing system tables too, which is probably
not what new folks are expecting. Also, it's not required when you say
'user tables', so it's similar to your user_tables v1 patch in that
regard.
> Yes, I will update the patch.
Still planning to do this..?
Marking this back to waiting-for-author.
Thanks!
Stephen
